This morning my pastor preached on Matthew 20—the parable of the vineyard workers.
It goes like this: A landowner hires laborers at dawn, then again at nine, noon, three, and five. At the end of the day, he pays every one of them the exact same wage: one denarius (about $30 today). The dawn workers are furious. They did more. They sweated longer. They earned it. The five o’clock workers showed up, barely broke a sweat before sunset, and still got the same coin.
This is one of the most offensive parables Jesus ever told. Not because it’s confusing—it’s quite clear—but because it violates everything Westerners believe about justice and fairness.
Our default is to look at the denarius. We compare wages. We count assets. We measure output against outcome and determine whether the math is just.
That’s exactly how the dawn workers processed it—they looked at the object, the coin, the compensation, and concluded that the system was broken. Same pay for unequal work? That’s not fair. That’s not right. Something needs to be corrected.
But Jesus doesn’t correct it. He lets the landowner—the authority figure the workers are dependent upon—speak for himself: “Are you envious because I am generous?” (v. 15).
That question reframes the entire parable.
The dawn workers weren’t underpaid. They received exactly what was promised. Their grievance wasn’t with their own wage—it was with someone else’s. They looked horizontally at what the other workers received and lost sight of the one who was doing the giving.
This is the objective trap. And this is why Jesus closes out the teaching with this famous line: “So the last will be first, and the first last.” (v. 16). Because life will never make objective sense. Life is ultimately ordered by someone else who is not any of us.
When we evaluate the fairness of life by looking at the objective outcomes—the wages, the blessings, the portions—we will always find something to resent. Someone got more. Someone got it easier. Someone showed up later and received the same wage.
The objective world is never going to satisfy our sense of justice because the objective world has no capacity for justice. Coins don’t have motives. Outcomes don’t have character. Blessings, viewed objectively, will always invite jealousy. The kind of jealousy that feels natural in the moment but slowly consumes the soul. Jealousy and envy are thus sins of self-cannibalism.
Thankfully, the parable doesn’t ask us to evaluate the wages. It asks us to evaluate the landowner.
That’s the subjective turn. The question was never “Is the same wage for all workers fair?” But “Is the one giving the wages good?”
If the landowner is good—if his character is just, his motives are generous, his authority is legitimate—then the distribution is not ours to audit. We don’t get to stand in the vineyard and demand an accounting for someone else’s grace. What belongs to them belongs to them, and the God who gives you yours is no less good than before. For what do we have that we have not received?
I think about this constantly. Not in the abstract, but personally: I survived a traumatic brain injury that should have ended my life or left me in a vegetative state. I have a wife who stayed. I have four children. I have a law career, a book, a speaking platform—none of which I manufactured from raw willpower. Every bit of it was given.
I’m one of those five o’clock workers holding a full day’s wage.
Thus, the temptation—the one the parable warns against from both directions—is to either resent someone else’s portion or take credit for my own. Both errors come from the same place: looking at the coin instead of the coinmaker. Fixating on the object instead of the subject.
The dawn workers couldn’t see the landowner’s goodness because they couldn’t stop staring at the five o’clock workers’ wages. And I think many of us live that way. We audit God’s generosity toward others instead of receiving His generosity toward us. We compare vineyards instead of trusting the vintner.
Grace always destabilizes merit. Grace surprised the dawn workers. It surprises the five o’clock workers. It surprised me in a hospital bed, and it still surprises me in the front pew on a Sunday morning. I don’t understand the distribution. I don’t know why my portion looks the way it does. But I’ve read about the Landowner. I know His character. I know He is just, and generous, and sovereign, and good. I also know my own sins and shortcomings, how undeserving I am of His generosity.
I wrote something years ago in Saving the Subject that is coming to mind here:
The world is objectively unfair:
Some live in mansions;
Others house under park benches.
Some run marathons;
Others muscle a wheelchair.
Some write books;
Others can barely read.
Most live to their seventies,
Some die in their twenties,
And many die as babies.
Someone else’s vacation spot
Is another’s nightmare.
Woe to the objective life
How she’s never been fair!
But the Landowner is. And that changes everything,
Leave a Reply